Posts Tagged ppi claims

PPI Claims – Solution To Your Mis Sold PPI Problems

Thursday, April 7th, 2011

Most people know that PPI stands for Payment Protection Insurance but most of them do not understand what Payment Protection Really is. PPI is commonly sold with financial products like credit cards, loans, and credit cards. Its purpose is to protect the consumer from getting covered in debt. For example if the person should not be able to pay his dues for the month because of some emergence it would be covered by the PPI. The situations covered by the PPI before it assumes the responsibility of paying are serious illnesses, grave accidents, and or redundancy.

In concept getting PPI claims is a smart choice but in reality the PPI is tainted with a lot of loopholes and are being abused by financial companies to generate more income. The main issue in this PPI topic the mis sold PPI, this have caused quite a stir in the claims world. Mis sold PPI is when you buy a financial product like a credit card and without you knowing the financial or credit company included an PPI plan in your contract. The cost of the PPI is automatically totaled to the bank charges.

Such actions by a credit company is considered malicious and as an offense punishable by law. If proven the lender would face fines and penalties.

Knowing More About PPI Claims

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

PPI claims are absolutely more intended and geared toward very specific period of time in a coverage which makes anyone covered at any given time during the process. Naturally, most coverage is only offered for a very limited amount of loan period times which provides an incredible amount of coverage overall. Thus, one should know what the time frame of coverage options are at any given time.

If there is ever a claim that is needed to be filed, there are actually only certain percentages of payments that are covered with this level of insurance. This percentage actually varies depending upon the financing options offered which is something that should be very seriously considered and known at all times. Thus, ensure this percentage is known for your claim process to be as prepared as possible.

There is a limited timeframe in which to get a claim processed by the damages scheme so it is important to use a company that has in depth knowledge of the processes. Failure to do so or the use of a sub-standard debt management of PPI claims organization may result in the abandonment of your claim, you will then make your PPI reclaim in this situation.

A claim against a liquidated company or one in administration is a complicated affair but the rewards are potentially greater. There are a number of practices to consider and complete in order to be remunerated for funds outlaid on the PPI

Limited Benefits of a Mis-sold PPI to Self-Employed

Monday, January 17th, 2011

Everyday, thousands of mis-sold PPI complaints are being brought to the Financial Ombudsman Service.  Thousands of these loan protection insurance were being mis-sold to consumers who were self-employed during the purchase.  The PPI policy is supposed to cover the loan repayments of the policyholders in times of illness and unable to work or if they are made redundant.  However, this product was being mis-sold to people who were unaware of the cover without knowing the criteria to make a claim.

The Financial Ombudsman Service made an investigation of mis-sold PPI complaint of one of the self-employed who took out this policy alongside his personal loan.  The consumer realized that the PPI policy was not suitable for him as he was self-employed and therefore only entitled to a limited benefits.  He decided to withdraw the policy but the lender rejected his claim.

The FOS found out in their investigation that the lenders clearly knew that the consumer was self-employed when he took out his policy.  The sales representative didn’t bother to explain the limited benefits of the policy to the consumer which made it mis-sold to the consumer.  The financial institution had given the consumer a written summary of the benefits of policy.  However, the FOS didn’t consider that piece of paper an adequate proof which highlighted the limited cover that the borrower would get from the policy.  The FOS told the lender to put the loan back where it would have been if the consumer had not taken the policy.  It was also ordered that all his payments for the policy shall be given back, with interest.